Almost Passive House

  • The House
    • Building Details
    • Floor plans
  • About Us
    • Contact us
    • Advertising
  • Resources
    • Random Notes
    • Books We Like
    • Links
    • Tips
  • Blog archive
 

Auf wiedersehen, passivhaus

Andrea — August 23, 2010

I should probably rename the website, because we're not actually building a full-fledged Passive House. But first, this update:

After waiting ages for our permits, we got our well drilled last week! It's 485 feet deep, which is roughly what we were expecting, and the flow rate is a respectable 8.5 GPM. The good news is that no hydrofracking was required (i.e. fracturing the rock in order to get more water out of it), which would have cost an extra $2,500. So that'll cover the cost our blowout engineering meeting a few weeks ago -- whee!

Anyway, we decided at the engineering meeting that we're not going to pursue Passive House certification. We haven't ditched any of our goals for energy-efficiency — we're simply not trying to shoehorn ourselves into a standard the house wasn't really designed for. Passive Houses are already extremely hard to build in North America, and we have the added challenges of a semi-wooded southern exposure and an architect who doesn't specialize in this kind of thing.

The good news is we're still building a really efficient house. It's going to be very tightly sealed, and we're taking extreme care to minimize thermal bridging. We're limiting the overall glazing, ordering fancy-pants windows from Germany (ka-ching!), using heaps of insulation, installing heat pumps and solar hot water, etc. Marc estimates that our heating and cooling load will be less than the plug load in a normal house.

So even though this won't be a Passive House™, it'll still adhere to the Passive House principles and be a major leap forward from standard construction.

‹ previous
next ›
  • Andrea's blog
  • Add new comment

Request for more info

carache — March 10, 2011

Dear Andrea & Ted:

I've read your few posts with interest and explored the links and tips, as well. The image of your house on the front page is, by the way, beautiful (and, btw, the website is nicely put together too -- very clean and intuitive to navigate).

In any event, I am trying to plot out a similar course for myself in Southern Vermont this year, albeit on a more modest scale, and was wondering about the status of your house. I was also wondering if there were any way you'd be willing to share more info about process/vendors/tradespeople via email or phone.

Thanks.

  • reply

Tragically...

Ted — August 25, 2010

...the official term is "hydrofracting," not "hydrofracking." But I'm okay with it if you want to keep calling it "hydrofracking." :')

  • reply

Random Bits

Do you really need solar panels?

Before installing solar panels, get a home energy audit to find out where you're wasting the most energy. Your house will be more comfortable if you seal leaks and add more insulation, so don't just slap solar panels on the roof without curbing energy use.

[ Browse all tips ]

Search

Tags

Conventional "wisdom" Expensive mistakes Floods Foundation Framing Fusspot alert Gardening Green Building 101 Haiku I swear this is true! Lighting Major geekage Passivhaus Roof SketchUp Windows

User login

  • Request new password
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system